[Talk-us] changeset: 89516909

[80hnhtv4agou at bk.ru]

tiger is up to date on the web map using the current data i just think he picked the wrong year,
 
also all he got was a white line in his first try.
Way: 813726663
Changeset # 89220282

  
>Monday, August 17, 2020 6:16 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson <miketho16 at gmail.com>:
> 
>1) Best not to delete and start over as the history will be lost.
>2) Do you have an accurate source that has a license that is compatible with OSM?   Could you share a link to it?
>3) General observation is that there is a lot of territory that is not enclosed by any admin level 8 boundary, which in a built up area like this, seems unusual to me.
> 
>Mike  
>On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:04 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us < talk-us at openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>this is not the current boundary, could be more than 10 years + old, 
>> 
>>can’t the whole relation, #126598, northbrook, be deleted and then put back in.
>> 
>>i tried by hand but this is to much to trace.
>>  
>>>Monday, August 17, 2020 4:43 PM -05:00 from Paul Johnson < baloo at ursamundi.org >:
>>> 
>>>On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 4:02 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us < talk-us at openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>>>can somebody who knows how to use Tiger data fix this ?
>>> 
>>>Fix what?? 
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Talk-us mailing list
>>>Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>>>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  _______________________________________________
>>Talk-us mailing list
>>Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us 
 
 
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20200818/1d1f411d/attachment.htm>