[Talk-us] Potential Mechanical Edit to remove access=private from Amazon Logistics driveways in NH
Matthew Woehlke
mwoehlke.floss at gmail.com
Mon Aug 31 14:57:13 UTC 2020
On 31/08/2020 10.18, Mike Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 7:46 AM Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> The objection is that access=private currently *has* an understood
>> meaning, and that meaning is *no* access without permission, not what
>> you described above.
>
> Sounds like my driveway. If you are using my driveway without my
> permission, either implicit (e.g. delivering a package) or explicit, I am
> going to ask you to leave. I think you are conflating whether something is
> "not allowed" with "can be prosecuted as a crime."
I think *you* are conflating implicit permission and explicit
permission. access=private as I understand the general community
consensus to be means no access without *explicit* permission. No access
without *implicit* permission is closer to access=destination... but
note I said "closer to". We don't seem to have something that exactly
means "no access except by *implied* permission".
--
Matthew
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list