[Talk-us] Deleting tiger:reviewed=no/addr:street for routes (was: Streaming JOSM -- suggestions?)

[Alex Hennings]

Regarding:
"
Often these private roads are posted with a sign that says something like
"Private road, no trespassing", or "Private Road, Residents and Guests
Only."
"

I've developed a strong opinion that a privately owned road (or anything
else) should be tagged "ownership=private". Don't confuse the ownership
with the access rights even though we use the same word for them in
English. Them being "often posted..." doesn't mean we can assume they
always are. Please only record data that there is evidence for.

-Alex

On Sun, Jul 12, 2020, 6:05 PM Mike Thompson <miketho16 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 10:28 AM Jmapb <jmapb at gmx.com> wrote:
>
> >  - The access -- somewhat common to find a pubic road imported with
> access=private, so if I suspect this I'll leave the tiger:reviewed=no tag
> until access can be confirmed, and add a note or fixme. (It's also quite
> common to find driveways imported as access=private. When surveying, I tend
> to remove the private tag if the driveway isn't gated or signed private,
> since access=private will prevent routing to the house at the end of the
> driveway, sometimes even ending the route on a different residential road
> that's physically closer to the house than the road the driveway's
> connected to.)
> I always thought that driveways to private residences and private roads
> (whether gated or not) should be tagged as access=private.  Often these
> private roads are posted with a sign that says something like "Private
> road, no trespassing", or "Private Road, Residents and Guests Only."
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20200712/ebeb7d92/attachment.htm>