[Talk-us] access=private on driveways
Eric H. Christensen
eric at aehe.us
Tue Jul 14 14:54:18 UTC 2020
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Tuesday, July 14, 2020 10:15 AM, Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.floss at gmail.com> wrote:
> The (possible) problem with having access implied by service=driveway is
> that a lot of access roads to stores/businesses/offices are also
> service=driveway... although I suppose you could argue these have the
> same semantics; you shouldn't be using them unless you're actually going
> to the location to which they provide access. (Which isn't to say that
> no one ever violates this...)
This ^^^ is, I believe, the crux of the matter. Driveways shouldn't (or should rarely be) access=private as they are actually access=destination. There are obvious times when you WANT someone to use your driveway. Are there times to mark a highway=* as access=private? Sure. But I don't think driveways should be, by default, thought of as private when they are expected to be used by people with a valid need to access the property. I believe that's what access=destination was designed for. It works on driveways and it works on neighborhood streets in gated communities (keeps the router from trying to route through the neighborhood) if my understanding is correct (at least it's worked well for me).
R,
Eric "Sparks"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: ProtonMail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=wdt9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list