[Talk-us] Labeling forestry service roads/tracks

[Tod Fitch]

> On Jul 20, 2020, at 4:48 PM, Tod Fitch <Tod at FitchFamily.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jul 20, 2020, at 4:35 PM, Clifford Snow <clifford at snowandsnow.us <mailto:clifford at snowandsnow.us>> wrote:
>> 
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:46 AM <tj-osmwiki at lowsnr.net <mailto:tj-osmwiki at lowsnr.net>> wrote:
>> Clifford,
>> 
>> Could you repost the legend? It's hard/impossible to make out the
>> surface reliably from aerial photos.
>> 
>> Sure - here is a link https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/7zQNGbyNQqBMj2S <https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/7zQNGbyNQqBMj2S>
> 
> Looks a bit different than the legend on my April 2020, Coconino National Forest Travel Map:
> 
> https://cloud.fitchfamily.org/index.php/s/eKCYzc4TfjMMfdN <https://cloud.fitchfamily.org/index.php/s/eKCYzc4TfjMMfdN>
> 
> —Tod

Oops. Deleted it off my cloud after sending email. Here is it again: https://cloud.fitchfamily.org/index.php/s/9nrCyifxX2swSH8

Just looked at a map for the Los Padres and for the Sabino Canyon Recreational area in the Santa Catalina Mountains of the Coronado NF. Those legends are different yet.

Is there a national standard that these forests are ignoring?
Is it on a FS region basis?
Is it on a forest basis?
Does it vary based on when a map was published?
I don’t see a consistent pattern with the FS maps I have at hand.

—Tod

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20200720/9b44af7b/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20200720/9b44af7b/attachment.sig>