[Talk-us] Mtb Route Relations

[Mike Thompson]

Let's say you have a trail in the US National Forest that was specifically
created for mountain biking. It has a name and a FS trail number. It is
represented in OSM by three ways currently: before a bridge, the bridge,
and after the bridge.

Is this a good candidate for a route relation?
Should name=* tag appear just on the relation, or on all of the member ways
as well?
Should ref=* tag appear just on the relation, or on all of the members as
well?

I am assuming that physical and legal access tags should only appear on the
member ways, even if every member has the same value, right?

Just don't want to break anything...

Mike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20200731/d72ad855/attachment.htm>