[Talk-us] National Forest boundaries

[brad]

On 6/20/20 6:19 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 5:45 PM stevea <steveaOSM at softworkers.com 
> <mailto:steveaOSM at softworkers.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I think we need both as well.  I've been doing this while watching 
> the evolution of how we best do this as I participate in a "do our 
> best, always better" efforts to accomplish this. Even now!
> >
> > The idea of the first kind is simply a relation with a focus on the 
> / a polygon with the outer (-most) membership. The idea of the second 
> kind is one of these plus a carefully crafted inner membership, often 
> made up of a complex inholding distribution containing many sometimes 
> complex themselves inner polygons.
> Thanks Steve for your insightful comments.
>
> I was thinking just create separate polygons for inholdings, tagged 
> with access=private and possibly ownership=private
>
> Mike
>
I think its simpler and better to just create an inner boundary as was 
done with the Coconino NF
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20200620/a3cd917e/attachment.htm>