[Talk-us] place=neighborhood on subdivisions?
Minh Nguyen
minh at nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
Thu Sep 24 07:49:03 UTC 2020
Vào lúc 21:47 2020-09-22, Paul Johnson đã viết:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:56 PM stevea
> <steveaOSM at softworkers.com
> <mailto:steveaOSM at softworkers.com>> wrote:
>
> If you MUST tag place=neighbourhood (note the u) see if you agree
> with me that this tag makes most sense in a hierarchy where
> place=suburb (and perhaps quarter, if applicable, is/are above) also
> exist(s). I'm not strictly saying I believe that
> place=neighbourhood CANNOT exist without place=suburb, but it makes
> me wrinkle my brow a bit at it not fitting as well as a
> landuse=residential (multi)polygon might rather generically and
> innocently (without any hierarchy required) fit in.
>
>
> Landuse=residential fits better for the lots within a place, not as a
> substitute for it.
I've never gotten into mapping individual lots, but I agree that
landuse=residential is a reasonable tag to use in conjunction with
place=plot. [1] I don't think that needs to be mutually exclusive of
mapping the surrounding subdivision as a named landuse=residential area.
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dplot
--
minh at nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list