[Talk-us] Rewriting route direction documentation to emphasize subrelations
Paul Johnson
baloo at ursamundi.org
Sun Aug 1 22:47:07 UTC 2021
On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 2:48 PM Tod Fitch <tod at fitchfamily.org> wrote:
>
> I don’t have a good feeling about how the whole country is, but all the freeways I have looked at in California have three relations (1 master and one each for the cardinal direction). In my area the US routes are mostly but not all using three relation scheme as are a few California state routes. At least for my editing style using JOSM, I much prefer the super/sub relation scheme as I find it easier to fix things when broken.
I can say this is also largely the case in Oklahoma, though for routes
with only one relation, then it's because splitting it is gross
overkill because the end of the route is on a single carriageway on
both ends and is thus extremely easy to validate with pretty much
everything except id anyway.
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list