[Talk-us] Fwd: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - boundary=forest(_compartment) relations

[Brian M. Sperlongano]

Hello all,

I am cross-posting this to talk-us for awareness (CC to the proposal
author) as I know many of you are not subscribed to tagging.  This proposal
has an impact on how US National Forests should be tagged, and since there
aren't any of these in my neck of the woods, it is probably a good idea for
those that are more familiar with these areas to review this proposal.

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Marchal via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Date: Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC -
boundary=forest(_compartment) relations
To: tagging at openstreetmap.org <tagging at openstreetmap.org>

Hello, there.

The below proposal (
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boundary%3Dforestry(_compartment)_relations),
about forest boundaries/compartments, has been deeply edited following
comment from reviewers, especially Jeisenbe and Zelonewolf. As it has known
substantial modifications, especially regarding its international use and
border cases, I hereby request additional reviews of it before vote.

Important notice: I, as the designer of this proposal, am a professional
forest manager, and designed the proposal along professional forestry
notions, which are more detailed and, sometimes, slightly different of what
general audience expects. Explaining these notions in a clear and
unambiguous way made the proposal quite long and verbose. Thus, reviewers
are invited to pay particular attention to
1. the understandability and unambiguousness, for general audience, of the
notions the proposal relies upon, and
2. the overall coherence between the exposed notions and the OSM customs
and practices.

Reviews and comments are to be made on the discussion page of the proposal,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/boundary%3Dforestry(_compartment)_relations
to keep them in a single place.

Awaiting your comments,

Regards
--
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Le mercredi, 30. décembre 2020 19:05, David Marchal <
penegal.fr at protonmail.com> a écrit :

> Hello, there.
>
> I designed a proposal for mapping forests and their compartments, by
separating these features from underlying landuse/natural features, thus
allowing to link non-wooded areas to their belonging forest :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boundary%3Dforest(_compartment)_relations#Features.2FPages_affected
>
> You may, and are invited to, comment this proposal on its discussion page
(
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/boundary%3Dforest(_compartment)_relations),
where a topic already waits your comments for improving the proposal.
>
> Awaiting your contributions,
>
> Regards.
> --
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20210126/943124aa/attachment.htm>