[Talk-us] Change sets covering entire US?

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Tue Nov 9 15:50:28 UTC 2021




Nov 8, 2021, 18:07 by zelonewolf at gmail.com:

>
>
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 11:49 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us <> talk-us at openstreetmap.org> > wrote:
>
>>
>> Nov 8, 2021, 13:18 by >> zelonewolf at gmail.com>> :
>>
>>> I don't have a problem with the large size of the bounding box, as it is clear from the changeset description what the change is, and it is topically consistent (i.e. - it's not a changeset with a park in New York, an ice cream shop in Albuquerque, and a river in St. Louis!).
>>>
>>> I *DO* have a problem with the change itself, as name:en is redundant when the name is already in English.  The data consumers that I'm familiar with (namely, OpenMapTiles, and my own service) that are tasked with extracting names in English are perfectly capable of looking for name:en first, and then falling back to name if name:en is not present.  So IMO, this is tag bloat.  I have added a changeset comment requesting an explanation for the change and will link to this discussion.
>>>
>> It is not really redundant as soon as you make a bit more interesting name display.
>>
>> if someone would want to display names in English but in case of English name being
>> unavailable, show German name (which would be preferred over say "京市北")
>>
>
> That's a reasonable use case that I hadn't considered.  It does still feel a bit redundant but I can accept that explanation.  It is probably worth adding a revision to the name=* wiki page expressing this.
>
It is already, in fact I added this already as usefulness of this info is quite surprising.

For example it surprised me when I initially implemented this fallback and
started getting German names for cities in Poland (typical case of software doing
what instructed, not what intended).

So I am not surprised that it is not known more widely.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Repeating_name_with_language_specific_tag

Feel free to edit it if something is poorly written there, maybe it should be also qualified
that such explicit language tagging is not fully accepted.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20211109/47f7d488/attachment.htm>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list