[Talk-us] Delete "Contiguous United States"?

[Ian Nicholson]

Agreed. The definition of contiguous US belongs in Wikipedia not OSM. 

Sent from my mobile device, please forgive any errors in my spelling or grammar.

> On Feb 16, 2022, at 08:42, Zeke Farwell <ezekielf at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 👍 Deleting seem appropriate to me.  Doesn't seem any more valuable than the Interstate highways mega relation we deleted a while ago because relations aren't categories.
> 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022, 9:27 AM Brian M. Sperlongano <zelonewolf at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The object in question is composed as a boundary containing the entire perimeter of the lower 48 states, that's why it's an 800+ member relation.
>> 
>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022, 8:58 AM Eric Patrick <txemt1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The Contiguous United States is only 48 states, not 800+. 
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 04:05 Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> today I happened upon a relation called "Contiguous United States"
>>>> (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9331155) and tagged as an
>>>> administrative boundary.
>>>> 
>>>> I would recommend to delete this relation because:
>>>> 
>>>> 1. There is no administrative entity called "Contiguous United States".
>>>> The "Contiguous United States" has no legal persona and no government.
>>>> It cannot therefore be an "administrative boundary".
>>>> 
>>>> 2. As far as I know, the "Contiguous United States" is simply a group of
>>>> states. As such, it does not have its own boundary. If, say, the
>>>> maritime boundary of Florida were to change, then the "Contiguous United
>>>> States" boundary would also change. Hence, if it *were* modeled in OSM,
>>>> it should be modeled as group of states and not as an individual
>>>> geometric form.
>>>> 
>>>> 3. Like any of these giant multipolygon and boundary relations, it
>>>> complicates editing - anyone splitting, say, a way on the US-Canadian
>>>> border will not only have to upload new relation versions for the US,
>>>> Canada, and the states/provinces involved, but also a new version of the
>>>> 800+ member "Contiguous United States". That's why this relation is
>>>> meanwhile at version 270 without a lot having *actually* changed.
>>>> 
>>>> If it were my home turf I'd just go ahead and delete it but since it's
>>>> not, I'll limit my actions to this post and leave any further actions or
>>>> inactions to you.
>>>> 
>>>> Bye
>>>> Frederik
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-us mailing list
>>>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-us mailing list
>>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20220216/28b58033/attachment.htm>