[Talk-us] Announcing progress: Minnesota Highway classification project publishes first guidance

[Bob Gambrel]

Thanks for the reply. Am not sure I can find the message but that
possibility has been given as an example of another way of doing it. I
think the consensus was to prefer B. (Again, in a Slack discussion).
Apparently this topic has been debated for years and years.

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 4:04 PM Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 4:00 PM Bob Gambrel <rjgambrel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am trying to understand your distinction in the last sentence: "If a
>> segment ends with an at-grade junction, it's still an expressway, but the
>> motorway ended with the previous junction." I guess I am confused by
>> "previous junction".
>>
> [...]
>
>>
>> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Example_of_where_to_end_a_motorway_island.jpg>
>>
>> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Example_of_where_to_end_a_motorway_island.jpg>
>> Example of where to end a motorway island.
>>
>
> I'd generally call A wrong, B an improvement but still weird, and in that
> example, at the split for the offramp to CR 15 westbound and at the end of
> the onramp from CR 15 eastbound to be the transition from motorway to trunk.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20220127/c1441ef8/attachment.htm>