[Talk-us] Highway ref on way or relation?

[Shawn K. Quinn]

On 7/5/22 15:55, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote:
> Yes, Clay has it right that both are needed, but to be more specific:
> 
> On ways, both the network and ref of all concurrent routes are packed 
> into the ref tag.  So you could have something like:
> ref=I-35;US-80;SR-25
> 
> That fictional road would be a member of three separate route relations 
> that look something like:
> network=US:I
> ref=35
> 
> network=US:US
> ref=80
> 
> network=US:TX:SR
> ref=25

Just as a point of reference, in Texas we are using "TX 25" and not "SR 
25" or "SH 25" for state highway routes.

-- 
Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn at rushpost.com>