[Openstreetmap] Which CC Licence for Data-Sets?

Saul Albert saul at twenteenthcentury.com
Mon Feb 28 17:41:53 GMT 2005

I replied to this criticism earlier on. It was a semi-joke. Sorry, obviously I
should try to moderate my sloppy writing style to exclude anything that might
be accidentally taken seriously.


Please respond to these issues (nobody else from the 'I don't want a licence'
camp) has yet, rather than to the obviously stupid ones which end in a :)

Anyway, I should have expanded the acronym fully to explain that PR stands (in
this case for) Pernicious Raillery.



On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:07:06PM +0000, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> On 22 Feb 2005, at 22:18, Saul Albert wrote:
> >1. Having a new licence, rather than just being a*no*ther CC project 
> >makes a
> >bit of a splash - a new nifty logo for people to use, a new cult that 
> >helps
> >with PR. :)
> When people start creating new licenses for PR purposes we've taken a 
> wrong turn somewhere. We should be trying to minimise the number of 

More information about the talk mailing list