[OSM-talk] Classifying Ways worldwide

Laurence Penney lorp at lorp.org
Thu Aug 3 11:55:14 BST 2006


Wollschaf and Mike Collinson makes some good points on separating physical 
descriptions and administrative classes, but I agree with Etienne that the 
physical descriptions need to be further split up. (Terminology is also 
problematic: 'waytype' and 'wayclass' are way too close!)

We need shorthand methods of referring to whole physical descriptions of ways, 
and defining them would ideally be possible within apps. Neighbourhoods often 
have many similar streets. E.g. once you'd set up a "typical Manhattan street" 
(width=2 trucks, parking=both, pavement=both, pavement_width=5 people), then you 
could use that for all streets that matched the initial physical definition.

I am in favour of human and vehicular units of measurement. We'll get fewer 
errors that way IMO (although perhaps North Americans will use "1 car" to mean 4 
or even 5m, considering how difficult they find driving in Europe...). Width in 
metres might be added automatically: (width_derived=5.3m)

-- Laurence

Joerg Ostertag (OSM Munich/Germany) wrote:
> ...
> 
>> If we are seeking a purely physical description of the roads then shouldn't
>> there be a separate key for each aspect of the road.  The following would
>> describe one carriageway of a motorway:
>> lanes=3
>> width=18m
>> breakdown_lane=yes
>> oneway=yes
>>
>> And this would describe a Sydney lane:
>> lane=1
>> width=3m
>>
>> One problem with this is that there is no easy way to accurately measure
>> the width of a road with a GPS unit.  Maybe the width attribute should
>> allow units other than metres (1 car, 2 trucks, 1 person), or approximate
>> values 0-5m, 5-10m, or even comparative values: very narrow, narrow,
>> normal, wide, very wide.
> 
> I would restrict the field to meters. Since this way we have a chance of 
> making use of it in automatic processing.
> And give the user some hints to enter data:
>  1m   for bikes and Foot only ;-)
>  3m   one car(narrow)
>  3,5m one car easily
>  4    one truck 
>  7m   two cars narrow
>  ...
> 
> -
> Joerg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk






More information about the talk mailing list