[OSM-talk] Stupid Josm question
Barnett, Phillip
Phillip.Barnett at itn.co.uk
Mon Jul 3 12:43:59 BST 2006
I'm an idiot. That's exactly what I was doing wrong. Thanks - that works
great.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Robinson [mailto:Andy_J_Robinson at blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 01 July 2006 23:19
To: Barnett, Phillip; talk at openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [OSM-talk] Stupid Josm question
When you load in the gpx file to JOSM, hit the "No" response to "Do you
want to open as raw data" and you will find all your trackpoints turned
into nodes and each separate continuous log turned into a way.
Not advisable to use this method in areas where there is already a lot
of data.
Cheers,
Andy
Andy Robinson
Andy_J_Robinson at blueyonder.co.uk
>-----Original Message-----
>From: talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Barnett, Phillip
>Sent: 01 July 2006 22:40
>To: Gabriel Ebner; talk at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: RE: [OSM-talk] Stupid Josm question
>
>But isn't that just going to produce raw tracks, (yellow data points)
>rather than finished roads? I want JOSM to stitch together the data
>points and produce a seamless sequence of segments... which it does
>internally, but, unless I'm misunderstanding, which I probably am,
>doesn't upload back to OSM.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org on behalf of Gabriel Ebner
>Sent: Sat 7/1/2006 9:32 PM
>To: talk at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Stupid Josm question
>
>On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 09:12:41PM +0100, Barnett, Phillip wrote:
>> I'm obviously missing something obvious here, but given that my GPS
>tracks,
>> loaded into josm and with the 'Draw lines between raw GPS points'
>> option, produces beautiful looking roads - why am I then
>> painstakingly adding
>nodes
>> and segments in an attempt to make an approximation of those
>automatically
>> generated by josm? Yes, there will be patches that require cleaning
>> up,
>but
>> in the main, a lot of the groundwork could already be done if I could
>just
>> get josm to upload the raw gps tracks as finished roads. The
>> conversion
>into
>> ways would still need doing manually, but the tracing of tracks is
>> hugely labour intensive, particularly if you're trying for accuracy
>
>Right click on the gps data layer, `Convert to data layer'. The
>resulting nodes however will have 'ele' and 'time' tags, and don't
>forget to remove the waypoints before uploading.
>
>> (btw, is approx 50 nodes for a 2 km stretch of minor country lane a
>> bit excessive, or what you need for accurate map making, as I think
>> it is
>> ....?)
>
>That's just 1 node every 40 meters, not that much if the road is curvy.
>I don't think that throwing away nodes for the sake of compactness is
>worth it, that can be done ad hoc if that should be necessary, it's
>much more difficult the other way. So better leave them in and try to
>make it look good (round curves).
>
> Gabriel.
>
>
>
>Please Note:
>
>
>
>Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not
>necessarily represent those of Independent Television News Limited
>unless specifically stated.
>This email and any files attached are confidential and intended solely
>for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
>If you have received this email in error, please notify
>postmaster at itn.co.uk
>
>Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection
>of our clients and business, we may monitor and read messages sent to
>and from our systems.
>
>Thank You.
Please Note:
Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of Independent Television News Limited unless specifically stated.
This email and any files attached are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity to which they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please notify postmaster at itn.co.uk
Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of our clients and business,
we may monitor and read messages sent to and from our systems.
Thank You.
More information about the talk
mailing list