[OSM-talk] Quality of Sirf star 3 tracks disappointing...

[Barnett, Phillip]

It looks like the Sirf III isn't the best thing for urban use?


-----Original Message-----
From: talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org on behalf of Emil Vaughan
Sent: Mon 7/10/2006 1:49 PM
To: talk at openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Quality of Sirf star 3 tracks disappointing...
 
On 7/10/06, Raphaël Jacquot <sxpert at esitcom.org> wrote:
> Nick Black wrote:
> > On 7/10/06, Raphaël Jacquot <sxpert at esitcom.org> wrote:
> >> Nick Black wrote:
> >> > I'd imagine that the Sirf III is "too sensitive" - its picking up all
> >> > kinds of singals that have bounced off all kinds of buildings.
> >> > Perhaps at the next London user group meeting we could log tracks at
> >> > the same time and compare the traces from an old chipset to the new
> >> > Sirf III from central London.
> >> >
> >>
> >> guess you need a better antenna, such as :
> >>
> >> http://www.trimble.com/l1l2chokering.shtml
> >
> > Yeah, that will do it.  Anyone got any spare cash? ;-)
> >>
> >
>
> you didn't specify that the solution was to cost less than 10 quids :D
>
I thought I needed a /worse/ antenna though :)

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk

Please Note:

 

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
those of Independent Television News Limited unless specifically stated. 
This email and any files attached are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity to which they are addressed. 
If you have received this email in error, please notify postmaster at itn.co.uk 

Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of our clients and business,
we may monitor and read messages sent to and from our systems.

Thank You.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20060710/3a50085b/attachment.html>