[OSM-talk] OSM Foundation voting

[Erik Johansson]

On 6/22/06, Tom Carden <tom at tom-carden.co.uk> wrote:
> On 22/06/06, Etienne <80n80n at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I agree, there was an open and agreed process.  It would be irregular
> > to re-open nominations after the start of the vote period.
> >
>
> Agreed.  The email about the process and especially the nomination
> deadline was quite clear.  If you didn't nominate, or register to vote
> (like me) then you can't expect to have your objections to the outcome
> listened to.  That's not to say your objections aren't valid, but the
> time to object has passed.
>
> > There are plenty of roles that need to be filled so anyone who wants
> > to help out will be welcomed.  One of the main points of getting
> > organised is to spread the workload so that Steve has more time and
> > OSM can move forward faster.
> >
>
> It's important to remember that the Foundation process is also about
> shifting liability away from Steve personally

How many did cast there votes?

Secondly I have no objections, never had, since I'm ill with not much
brain activity.

And, I'm not so sure how English law works but in Sweden the chief of
an organization is the one that gets the biggest blame, even for the
actions of Etienne and Imi.. ;-)


-- 
/Erik