[OSM-talk] TIGER 101

Andy Robinson Andy_J_Robinson at blueyonder.co.uk
Thu Nov 30 15:20:02 GMT 2006


Ben,

Looking at the San Francisco data newly imported it still appears that ways
are being added without connection to adjacent ways, ie there is no sharing
of common nodes. See JOSM screen dump where I have selected and dragged a
way. It should have tugged the adjacent ways too.

http://ajr.hopto.org/osm/tiger-nodes.png

Cheers

Andy

Andy Robinson
Andy_J_Robinson at blueyonder.co.uk 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Ben Gimpert
>Sent: 30 November 2006 2:53 PM
>To: talk at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: [OSM-talk] TIGER 101
>
>Hi OSM,
>
>The TIGER -> OSM import is (again) kicked off and going.
>
>Since there is now disaster recovery logic atop a MySQL tracking
>database, a proper status report is possible.  Unless there are any
>objections, I intend to commit the status report to the OSM SVN
>repository every night at 3am:
>
>		http://svn.openstreetmap.org/utils/tiger_import/status
>
>Dig the tiny-but-increasing numbers for CAlifornia, around our first
>prioritized counties (for Mikel).
>
>		Cheers,
>		Ben
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk






More information about the talk mailing list