[OSM-talk] Map features page information

[Andy Robinson]

I agree, there is going to be confusion here and I take your point. However
I guess I will be using natural=woodland in most instances unless it’s
clearly a plantation where all the trees are in strict rows like a
coniferous forest.

Cheers

Andy

Andy Robinson
Andy_J_Robinson at blueyonder.co.uk 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Tom Chance
>Sent: 19 September 2006 10:04 AM
>To: talk at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Map features page information
>
>Ahoy,
>
>On Tuesday 19 September 2006 09:36, Andy Robinson wrote:
>> Thanks Mike, I've changed your forest and wood comments a little to
>reflect
>> the fact that these would be Managed. Wood being principally deciduous
>and
>> forest being principally coniferous. Have also added a "woodland" value
>to
>> the "natural" section to cover naturally occurring woodland.
>
>Oh blimey, so when on walks should I assume it's naturally occurring unless
>it's being used for lumber, in which case it becomes a landuse=wood?
>Because
>of course almost no woodland in the UK is unmanaged and unused.
>
>Regards,
>Tom
>
>--
>The struggle against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting
> - Kundera
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/450 - Release Date: 18/09/2006
>

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/450 - Release Date: 18/09/2006