[OSM-talk] Another point in support of ways as ordered lists

[Joerg Ostertag (OSM Munich/Germany)]

On Wednesday 20 September 2006 17:16, Wollschaf wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:38:25 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> > - ways not being *ordered* lists of segments
> > - segments not all aligned in the same direction along a way
>
> Wouldn't it be better to just postprocess the data to ensure certain
> standards? I don't think it is a problem to distrubute a new type of
> planet.osm that is processed, adding new information and reducing
> hardware requirements on client applications.

I'm just trying to change osm2csv for doing some of these, but my current 
problem ist:

It's running since 18 hours and still has only 17% of the elements read. SO 
the estimate is way ofer 200 hours to still have to run for reading.

Read(world):  elem:8947531 17%(8947530)   nodes:8423280 60%(8423280)   nodes 
named:6348  tags:524250  18.83(112.64) hours

Any help on this is really welcome.


-- 
Jörg (Germany, Munich)

http://www.ostertag.name/
TeamSpeak2: ts2.ostertag.name, user: tweety, Channel: "GPS Drive"
irc://irc.oftc.net/#osm