[OSM-talk] Osmarender - rendering of segments - possible compromisesolution
David Groom
reviews at pacific-rim.net
Mon Sep 25 15:21:40 BST 2006
blank
----- Original Message -----
From: "Etienne" <80n80n at gmail.com>
To: <talk at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 2:51 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Osmarender - rendering of segments - possible
compromisesolution
> Having reviewed the feedback from the release of Osmarender 3.0 it is
> clear
> that many people have been tagging segments that are parts of ways as a
> method of indicating that some part of the way is different. For example
> a
> way might be tagged as a residential but one segment within the way might
> be
> tagged with abutters=retail.
>
> It seems to me that this is a valid use case.
>
> I want to propose a solution that allows this use case but still does not
> render raw segments that are NOT part of a way. This will allow segments
> to
> be tagged as an override to a way but will continue to discourage tagging
> of
> segments on their own.
>
> Currently you can choose what elements to select as part of a rule:
>
> <rule e="node|segment|way" ...> will select all nodes, segments and ways.
>
> I'm proposing a new pseudo-element selector called waysegment, which will
> match segments that are part of a way, but not match bare segments that
> are
> not part of a way. Such a rule would look like this:
>
> <rule e="node|waysegment|way" ...> will select all nodes, all segments
> that
> are part of a way and all ways.
>
> What do people think?
It gets my vote.
David
>
> Etienne
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
More information about the talk
mailing list