[OSM-talk] Cycle route planning using OSM

[Dirk-Lüder Kreie]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Stevenson schrieb:
>>> highway=cycleway
>>> cycleway=opposite_lane
>> Is an additional way the best option here? To capture both contra-flow lanes and lanes on only one side we could use:
>>
>> cycleway=lane / opposite_lane / lane_left / lane_right / opposite_lane_left / opposite_lane/right
>>
>> Where left and right are relative to the direction of the way. The tag would be in addition to the main highway type. Separate ways would seem to be more appropriate for paths that are set away from the road.
>>
> 
> How do we want this rendered?
> Would it look better to have a cycleway rendered as a separate way along
> side the highway?

I just want to add that there is a cycle at home layer planned for
tiles at home. It's pretty much ready infrastructure-wise, but lacks good
osmarender stylesheets that highlight cycle/footways and features
relating to them.

- --

Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie
Bremen - 53.0952°N 8.8652°E

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGMgEaFUbODdpRVDwRAtOdAJ4mD7WJCiFaxfZ+1Zy1mBFspOtdwgCePY8M
JUPOM+TqV49RskAiJ3RGK70=
=T7jD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----