[OSM-talk] Observed vs. official designation [was: Oxford High Street classification (Was: Bus sluice/gate)]
David Earl
david at frankieandshadow.com
Thu Dec 6 21:13:40 GMT 2007
On 06/12/2007 20:26, Gervase Markham wrote:
> David Earl wrote:
>> (2) It is very hard to get the "official" information. Most of us only
>> have what we see in front of us to work from. It is impractical.
>
> Official information is on every road sign. If my road is the B1250,
> then it's a B-road, and should be graded secondary. But I then might add
> speed limit, width restriction or other tags to indicate navigational
> complexities.
No it isn't - that's the whole problem.
(a) that's a very UK-centric view of the world
(b) it isn't true even in the UK. This whole discussion arose out of the
A120 through Oxford where the signs disagree with the official
designation. If the signs always showed the designation, we wouldn't be
having this discussion.
(c) In the UK, tertiary roads ("C roads") aren't signposted to
distinguish them for unclassified roads. (It is helpful both in the
urban and rural areas to distinguish unnumbered "through" roads from
other streets. Yes that's a matter of judgement, but it makes for a much
more useful map for display and routing. I'll show some examples if you
like).
David
More information about the talk
mailing list