[OSM-talk] request for more votes

[Robin Paulson]

On 14/12/2007, Gregory <nomoregrapes at googlemail.com> wrote:
> The 2 disapprovals were:
> -under which tag it comes: could this be changed to make everyone happy, or
> as the vote is won we use leisure and can always change it later (it's
> unique enough for a search and replace)

to be honest, the argument that it should be under a different tag was
somewhat pointless anyway

> -it doesn't allow areas: I agree and don't see why it shouldn't be used for
> areas, can we add that allowance without anyone who voted complaining?

it does allow areas, this was what everyone voted for, most have
mentioned it in their vote. so one of the votes is thus reversed
(Hawke), as his only reservation was that it didn't allow areas.

"I approve the leisure=zoo tag value (for nodes and areas)." is the key phrase

> In the comments
> -debate over the icon. But hey, the vote has been passed lets get tagging
> and the discussion on the icon can be agreed when someone submits something
> suitable(if nobody does, use the elephant).
> -- A zoo map with each animal can be a specialist render that has it's own
> non-animal icon.

iocns are nothing to do with us, that's for the maintainer of the
renderer to sort out - as i understand it, the rendering section of
each proposal is only a suggestion

> But if the majority of votes are approvals (23 to 2) then technically the
> vote has been passed, add it to map features.