[OSM-talk] Part-municipalities and more place issues
Ben Laenen
benlaenen at gmail.com
Sat Dec 29 22:39:45 GMT 2007
Hi all,
We're trying to find some way to tag some oddities for places in
Belgium, so I hope if some of you could give some insight in how best
to tag these.
Some little history: In the 1960's till the 1980's a lot of
municipalities merged with other municipalities. Many were subsumed
into other ones, or sometimes two of about the same size were combined
into one. This meant that over 2500 municipalities became less than
600, but those municipalities didn't just disappear: they formed a new
subdivision.
The effect of this was that there were two new terms for administrative
divisions: "deelgemeente" (could be translated as "part-municipality")
and "district" (this is actually the same, but only the
part-municipalities of Antwerp are called district, just to say that we
don't need specific tags for just the districts).
So it's actually quite easy: we have municipalities which exist out of
different part-municipalities. But we can't tag those properly now.
Some problems we have:
* There are municipalities with names
like "Houthalen-Helchteren", "Knokke-Heist", etc. As you might have
guessed: these are each actually two bigger "towns" which form one
municipality. One town is called e.g. Houthalen, the other one
Helchteren. Sometimes you see that depicted on maps like "Houthalen-"
on one part, and "Helchteren" on the other one, like:
Houthalen-
Helchteren
* We have no way to properly tag part-municipalities or districts, yet
we all use the name of those part-municipalities when we need to go
there. Reserving a tag like "suburb" is quite undoable: the population
of these part-municipalities and districts varies from a few dozen to
over 70.000. The latter one should really display much more prominently
than the former on the map. The latter one also should display more
prominently than another municipality with 5.000 inhabitants.
* To be quite blunt: I don't like the usage of the city/town/... tags:
I'd like it much more that there are general tags like "municipality"
(and in our case also something like "part-municipality"), and use an
extra "population" tag to know how big to render the name. In
Belgium "city" is a title given to a municipality (I think the UK has
the same system), and if we tagged every city as such over a fifth of
all municipalities would be a city (133 of 589), which would make the
map of Belgium quite interesting...
So, my suggestion: I'd like to see a new key "municipality" being used
from now on, and useage of the "population" key (Wikipedia has a lot of
info on that). But if someone decides now that cities of 1 million
people should show more prominent on the map, he at least can do that
somehow (but all the ones with population over 100.000 now get the same
city tag). But that way we can introduce other tags
like "part-municipality" (and what other things might exist on this
planet?), which don't need seperate rules to display them on the map.
The way I'm personally tagging things in Belgium now is: discard all
info about municipalities/districts, and use for example "town" for a
district of 70.000 inhabitants. Surely that's a nice way to get it
rendered nicely, but you'd lose the data that one belongs to the other
one. is_in wouldn't do its job to fix that: is_in=Antwerpen could mean
anything from province, arrondissement (group of municipalities, we
need a tag once for that too maybe, but that's not urgent, we don't
really use that one :-) ), municipality and district...
Anyway, I still need to find a nice way to render the
Houthalen-Helchteren case, so it's not like:
Houthalen
Houthalen-Helchteren
Helchteren
on the map. The only way I can see it work like above is
a "display_like" tag, which incidentally would be quite useful for
bilingual municipalities/streets/etc in e.g.
Brussels: "name:fr=Bruxelles", "name:nl=Brussel", "display_as=Bruxelles -
Brussel". I got the idea once to make use of the ";" delimiter for
different tags, so we get "name=Brussel;Bruxelles", but that doesn't
render like I'd like (one name on a different line for example, or for
streets divided by a "-")...
But I'm diverging now too much, the issue was about
part-municipalities :-)
So, any ideas?
Greetings
Ben
More information about the talk
mailing list