[OSM-talk] landuse=urban
Nick Whitelegg
nick at hogweed.org
Sat Feb 10 13:07:25 GMT 2007
On Saturday 10 Feb 2007 12:54, Tom Chance wrote:
> Ahoy,
>
> On Saturday 10 February 2007 12:18:28 Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> > What would be useful I feel is a generic tag for any urban area, so that
> > urban and countryside areas can easily be distinguished. landuse=urban
> > seems a good choice. This would make it easy, for example, to draw an
> > urban area based on the Landsat or Yahoo imagery. Any comments on this?
>
> Just curious, what do we lack with
> landuse=residential/retail/industrial/etc? If people use those then surely
> entire urban areas are clearly marked off? If there are urban areas that
> don't fit into those categories then we could expand the list.
>
> Regards,
> Tom
The problem is that you might not know what is what, also it's significantly
more effort (could involve creating 50 areas rather than just one). If you're
using Landsat imagery or Yahoo imagery outside of the high-resolution areas,
you can easily tell what's urban and what isn't, but little more than that.
That's not to say remove the finer-grained classification, but marking out
whole urban areas with landuse=urban would make mapping which aims to
distinguish between urban and non-urban areas much easier to generate.
Nick
More information about the talk
mailing list