[OSM-talk] Several approved features moved to Map_features page
Ben Robbins
ben_robbins_ at hotmail.com
Mon Feb 19 23:44:51 GMT 2007
>>If people have greens that are a lump of grass that is clearly different
>>from everywhere else, then the tag would be usable for them, but I
>>havn't seen a place like that before.
>I have - it's pretty normal. Commonly it has a cricket pitch. For example:
>http://local.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&cp=51.711631~-1.007389&style=a&lvl=17&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000
>(not sure what people will think of me posting links to Virtual Earth
>here) :-)
I would tag the pitch as sport=cricket, or if its used for other things then
landuse=recreational_ground. (leisure=pitch, or landuse=field* may also
work) They are all standard tags. That is a very similer example to that of
a village near me called badby. The green and the cricket pitch are
seperate though and there not really the same thing. Tag how you wish
though. My concern is just that a village green is not always as clear and
as definate as seems to be being suggested, and seeing as that all I map is
villages pretty much, I have seen quite a few of them.
Ben
* I always asumed a field was...well a field, but after looking round the
other day trying to find what people had been using to render recreational
grounds I found that it was "landuse=field"
_________________________________________________________________
http://homepage.msn.com/zune?icid=hmetagline
More information about the talk
mailing list