[OSM-talk] confused about roundabouts and ways
Andrew Loughhead
andrew at incanberra.com.au
Tue Jan 2 07:10:02 GMT 2007
In previous list discussions I find the recommendation to tag
roundabouts with junction=roundabout, highway=secondary (for example).
Thats fine, but I can't see a description of how the ways should be
constructed. The previous osm-talk discussions don't specify, but can I
assume that we want to tag ways, not segments, even for roundabouts?
Specifically:
Is junction=roundabout applied to segments or a ways?
If there are triangles connecting the roundabout to single carriageway,
are the two connecting pieces part of the roundabout way?
Lets say the roundabout is a junction of two different classes of road,
highway=secondary and highway=unclassified, all four connecting roads
are single carriageway, and all four connect to the roundabout with
triangles. The roundabout way would usually want to be
highway=secondary. But if the roundabout way includes the triangles of
the highway=unclassified road, then the triangles will render as
highway=secondary, which will be ugly and misleading.
If a road has the same name each side of a roundabout, is each bit a
separate way? Or can they be disconnected parts of a single way?
The editing guidelines say each direction of dual carriageway should be
a separate way. If a road alternates between dual carriageway and single
carriageway, is each part a separate way? If so, does this apply to
things like roundabout triangles, where the road is briefly dual
carriageway?
Do roundabouts get a name attribute?
Am I missing something on the wiki which explains this?
Thanks
Andrew.
More information about the talk
mailing list