[OSM-talk] Server slowness
SteveC
steve at asklater.com
Mon Jan 15 13:32:30 GMT 2007
* @ 15/01/07 01:21:27 PM nick at nickhill.co.uk wrote:
> SteveC wrote:
> >* @ 15/01/07 11:45:42 AM nick at nickhill.co.uk wrote:
> >>I echo Richard's post.
> >>
> >>But I would add the rider that the current OSM set-up is by no means
> >>optimised. I estimate organising the data on disc according to geographic
> >>location, and partitioning the database can improve node look-ups by an
> >>order of magnitude. Therefore, a direct comparison should implement
> >>partitioning.
> >>
> >>Notwithstanding, I fully concur with previous posts that if OSM data
> >>model were shared with with the rest of the open GIS community, many
> >>benefits would be derived.
> >
> >What benefits?
>
> Standardisation brings a whole load of benefits. Not just easier use of
> data, but shared fruits of development effort.
Yes, I know, but I was looking for any specific benefits. Like 'oh we
could use this piece of software with it'.
have fun,
SteveC steve at asklater.com http://www.asklater.com/steve/
More information about the talk
mailing list