[OSM-talk] Forking ways?
Andy Robinson
Andy_J_Robinson at blueyonder.co.uk
Tue Jan 23 12:13:49 GMT 2007
The now preferred method is to break it up into separate linear ways with no
forks although perhaps there should be more discussion whether you make the
central loop a single way in these instances. The total number of ways would
be 5 if you did that and only 4 if you ignore the loop. Probably name
rendering preferences play a part.
Cheers
Andy
Andy Robinson
Andy_J_Robinson at blueyonder.co.uk
>-----Original Message-----
>From: talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Frith
>Sent: 23 January 2007 11:33 AM
>To: talk at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: [OSM-talk] Forking ways?
>
>Hi folks,
>
>I'm mapping a suburb which has quite a lot of streets that "fork"; in
>fact I have one street name which looks like:
>
> |
> |
> |
> +----------+---------
> | |
> | |
> | |
> | |
>----------+----------+---------
>
>The question I have is: do I make all the segments into one way that
>forks and isn't topologically a line; or do I make several ways with the
>same name, dividing it up into separate non-forking lines?
>
>Thanks,
>Adrian Frith
More information about the talk
mailing list