[OSM-talk] Fwd: Online discussion group for geospatial computing

[Stephen Gower]

  For info, this isn't quite OSM, but there have been some people
  talking about historical/archeological mapping on here.

----- Forwarded message -----

From:         Ann Borda <a.borda at JISC.AC.UK>
Subject: Online discussion group for geospatial computing
To:           JISC-ERESEARCH at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Date:         Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:11:51 +0100

***APOLOGIES for CROSS-POSTING***

May be of interest to colleagues

Thanks
Ann


-----Original Message-----
From: Announcement list for the Arts and Humanities e-Science Support Centre on behalf of Lydia Horstman
Subject: Online discussion group for geospatial computing
 
Mapping the Past - geospatial computing in history and archaeology

We would like to invite you to join an online discussion group that deals
with the application of geospatial computing in the fields of archaeology
and history:

http://www.arts-humanities.net/mapping_past

This group originated from the AHRC ICT Methods Network workshop
'Space/Time: Methods in geospatial computing for mapping the past' held in
Edinburgh earlier this week:
http://www.methodsnetwork.ac.uk/activities/act24.html

After two days of lively discussion, we concluded that it would be
interesting to continue the exchange of ideas beyond the event itself - and
to invite other interested parties to join us. As we did some live blogging
during the workshop, you can get an idea of the questions and problems we
discussed. A more formal report, papers and presentations will be published
later.

This group is part of a new online community initiative called 'Digital Arts
& Humanities' that is being developed by the Methods Network and partners
and is hosted at King's College London: http://www.arts-humanities.net.

Please circulate this email to colleagues and friends who might be interested!

Stuart Dunn, Leif Isaksen and Torsten Reimer

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anything in this message which does not clearly relate to the official
work of the sender's organisation shall be understood as neither given
nor endorsed by that organisation.
  

----------------------------------------------------------------------