[OSM-talk] urban surveying speed - can it be estimated as population per hour?
Robert (Jamie) Munro
rjmunro at arjam.net
Thu Jun 7 13:17:12 BST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dan Moore wrote:
> hi,
>
>> Given the current level of activity, and rate of growth, the whole project seems to be
>> almost feasible ;)
>
> it almost seems that way! but let's not get carried away - it wouldn't do to sell short the big map data providers ;-)
>
> anyways, thinking forward, do you reckon:
>
> (i) the rate of road addition will go pretty linearly up to 100% completion of road network and then stop (presumably, then, with ongoing addition of more detailed attributes and points of interest); or
>
> (ii) we'll start hitting a level of completeness where it's difficult to discern what's completed and what's not, and the last mile(s) will be by far the hardest? at what % completeness would we start seeing that?
Because completeness is hard to define (do you include footpaths etc.)
and we have no way to record it, I don't think we can talk % complete in
any useful way.
Therefore I think we're stuck with option (ii).
If we can get OSM on TomToms or a similar devices that people can take
with them all the time, they will be able to spot the bits of the map
that are missing and add them as they are driving around normally. Once
that happens, I'm sure we will very quickly complete all the roads that
people actually use, if not all the roads that exist.
Robert (Jamie) Munro
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGZ/dEz+aYVHdncI0RAgs4AKCnFIstz73xQzZEj3xdwagX3NS+JgCgon1B
vwh2vImlffG+H3K1IY4Qa7g=
=rpnX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the talk
mailing list