mike at ayeltd.biz
Sat Jun 16 09:04:16 BST 2007
At 09:26 PM 15/06/2007, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>On 6/14/07, David Earl <david at frankieandshadow.com> wrote:
>> I added the Snowdon Mountain Railway a while ago (railway=narrow_gauge).
>> The stations are rendered on both maps but the railway isn't, so it
>> looks like there is a series of isolated stations in the middle of nowhere.
>As a side note, is it a good idea to use phrases like "narrow_gauge".
>I can guess that many places in the world have a "narrow_gauge" and
>they mean different things.
>Do we care about the gauge? If so, shouldn't we be exact about it
>(number of centimetres).
A while ago I edited http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Map_Features definition for railway=rail very carefully with that in mind "Full sized passenger or freight trains in the standard gauge for the country or state" . That avoids the anglo-centric gauge definition: Standard gauge = 4' 8 1/2", broad gauge = anything wider, narrow gauge = anything narrower; (although the schema IS widely used internationally). For example, Queensland, Australia uses what would be regarded as narrow gauge elsewhere, 3' 6", though the situation is a bit confused because they also now have interstate 4' 8 1/2" track.
I suggest a similar definition for narrow gauge:
"Passenger or freight train track in a gauge smaller than the standard for the country or state, typically less than 4' 8 1/2" "
Sorry for the archaic units of measurements!
More information about the talk