[OSM-talk] Advanced relationships

[Matthias Julius]

"Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog at gmail.com> writes:

> On 6/20/07, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > The current wiki page for "advanced relationships" _does_ propose using
>> > segments, gives several examples using segments.

That's a use example, not a requirement for relationships.

>>
>> Yes but that's because people still think in segments; all the examples
>> are equally valid if you substitute ways for segments. The methods
>> discussed do not require segments.
>
> Altough, if two ways intersect more than once you'll have an
> interesting problem...

The node should be part of the relationship.

Matthias

>
> Also, many representations of street numbers also look at segments
> (there's some street number data in the DB already). I don't think
> segments will totally vanish, but they may possibly be replaced with
> "sub-ways".
>
> Have a nice day,
>  --
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog at gmail.com> http://svana.org/kleptog/
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk