[OSM-talk] Tiles at home Update
osm-list at deelkar.net
Thu Mar 22 04:42:01 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> matthew-osm at newtoncomputing.co.uk> wrote:
>> On the other hand, maybe the definition actually is
>> "ordered" and I missed that bit ;-).
> They are ordered, as in the API/DB will return them in the same order they
> were uploaded. That's in the spec.
> The only problem is that there is no semantics defined as to what that
> ordering should be -- it's entirely up to the uploaders. So no, they're not
> errors as such, other than they don't render nicely without preprocessing,
> and there seems to be a general consensus on what constitutes a nice way
> for these purposes, and they aren't it.
> Of course, in a future version of the OSM data model it's possible this
> might change, at which time they may become errors, but until then
> renderers/editors etc will just have to cope (or not cope, with the
> intention of making users change things manually, assuming they can
> figure out what's wrong).
> Personally I think coping is the best way to go... OSM data will always
> be a
> little fuzzy round the edges, and not rendering a mess makes sense to me.
I'm not sure about the percentage worldwide, but I know for at least 2
German Cities (Karlsruhe and Bremen) that there at least the Frollo
preprocessor is a giant waste of time and resources, because there are
next to no unordered ways there. However the overhead introduced by
Frollo brings it back to rendering times before any of the optimizations
thought out by Ojw and others (including me). Besides, the preprocessor
shuts out a whole lot of renderers that simply can't render any tiles
that are a little more complete, London for instance is barely updated
anymore. In IRC there have been several mentions of tile areas that
simply don't render anymore on some clients because the preprocessor
While I agree that it is better to have nice maps I still think the
rendering preprocessor is the worst place to "correct" unordered ways.
I was always under the impression that ways should be well ordered,
preferably non-branching and contiguous, because that way it's the
easiest to actually *do* things with the data (not just rendering).
So if nobody cares what order the segments in a way are but the
renderers (there are other uses that would benefit from ordered ways)
then why not create the ways ordered? JOSM for instance has every tool
needed to help this along.
Concerning the "fuzzy around the edges" part nobody hinders anyone
running frollo on a piece of data and uploading the result back to the
db, which would fix that area not only for the one rendering but for
other uses and most of the time even future renders of that area, too.
Why does this have to be done again and again *every* *single* *time*?
And no, I don't like the idea of having the Frollo preprocessor upload
it's changes under my username automatically within the tiles at home
project, for reasons which should be quite obvious.
- - Frollo shuts out renderers from tiles at home
- - Frollo takes an insane amount of resources (RAM and time) for what it
- - Frollo just fixes the data locally for *one* rendering job, no other
benefit comes from it
- - The resources needed to process densely mapped tiles exceed those
available on some tiles at home renderers
- - The data can be fixed in the main db easily
- - Errors on the osmarender (t at h) layer help to locate errors, and these
are easily corrected and the affected tiles can easily be re-rendererd
So why again, are we using it in tiles at home?
Because it renders nicer maps. Or does it?
I'm not at all against some sort of preprocessing, Frollo seems to do a
good job at what it does for single renderings, so I'm not generally
against this script, just that it doesn't make any sense to me using it
in t at h, considering the cost.
Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the talk