[OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] New JOSM version for 0.4 API

[SteveC]

On 6 May 2007, at 00:19, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> Steve mentioned that JOSM should
>> probably be preserving these in the saved data.
>
> Makes sense, but I don't understand what "visible" is for. Will the  
> API
> ever serve "invisible" records, and if so, how is JOSM expected to  
> deal

First the API is not perfect (obviously).

Second, think of history APIs - they need to show whe things were  
visible or not.

Thanks for your help fixing JOSM :-)

have fun,

SteveC | steve at asklater.com | http://www.asklater.com/steve/