[OSM-talk] TIGER update (need more suggestions)

[kiyanda2 at uiuc.edu]

I'm relatively new around here and am still trying to get a hold of how to do this, but New Mexico is pretty much all empty (except for some secondary highways at the very south.

Since it's "much easier to import Tiger data before than after", it'd be nice if New Mexico were imported.

Perhaps only Santa fe County and Los Alamos County (which are empty except for some tracks in Los Alamos, which I did). I live there and I was trying to work on those 2 counties. Now that I think of it, perhaps better to import only Los Alamos county and Santa Fe county. Then if I screw things up, there's less to fix.

So official suggestion:

Santa Fe County
Los Alamos County
(Both in New Mexico)

Thanks,

Charles 

---- Original message ----
>Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:10:32 -0800
>From: Dave Hansen <dave at sr71.net>  
>Subject: [OSM-talk] TIGER update (need more suggestions)  
>To: Talk Openstreetmap <talk at openstreetmap.org>
>
>We're moving right along with the TIGER upload:
>
>http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~daveh/tiger/stats.html
>
>But, I'm just about out of states, again.  If anyone wants to give me
>names of relatively empty counties (or entire states), I'll add them to
>the queue.  If there are existing data in place, please make
>arrangements to clean it up in some way before the TIGER data is
>uploaded over it.  Believe me, it's a *LOT* easier to do this before
>rather than after the fact. :)
>
>-- Dave
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk