[OSM-talk] Surveying
Christoph Eckert
ce at christeck.de
Sun Nov 18 22:46:19 GMT 2007
Hi,
> I realise that, in one sense, there's no end to the level of detail you
> could add, but it would be nice to know if there's some consensus on
> what needs to be annotated to consider the map "good enough".
I fear the optinions on this matter will differ. It depends on the motivation
and intention of each individual mapper. Some will be pleased by streets and
their names, others will be interested in details, some may be interested in
special things.
IMO the map features page in the wiki is a good starting point.
Best regards,
ce
More information about the talk
mailing list