[OSM-talk] best way to map large areas
Andy Allan
gravitystorm at gmail.com
Thu Nov 29 22:57:26 GMT 2007
On Nov 29, 2007 9:53 PM, Robin Paulson <robin.paulson at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30/11/2007, Alex S. <maps at swavely.com> wrote:
> > Robin Paulson wrote:
> > > i want to create some landuse=residential areas for Auckland, and
> > > they're going to be pretty big; what's the best approach?
> > > [..]
> > > 2. map it as several smaller areas, which overlap (seems clumsy)?
> >
> > Not overlap - abut. Break up the areas by some system you deem
> > appropriate, such as per subdivision, per neighborhood, break at major
> > streets, etc.
>
> that was the way i originally considered, but then i found that
> smaller areas will render on top of a larger one. i was going to
> create a large residential area covering a big part of the city, and
> then drop retail and industrial areas, aprks, schools, etc. (all
> smaller than the residential area) on top of that. a lot less fiddly
> to make
You can't really do it that way*. A given point should only lie within
the boundaries of whichever landuse areas are appropriate - so if it's
purely industrial, it shouldn't lie within a (larger) residential
area. Generally the main ones that make sense are overlapping
commercial and residential, to show that there are shops and housing
at the same coordinates.
Cheers,
Andy
* Of course you can do whatever you like really, there's nothing stopping you!
More information about the talk
mailing list