[OSM-talk] specific Relations

[Frederik Ramm]

Hi,

> I have started a set of pages to propose and describe adopted specific 
> Relations, now we have them. This is linked off Proposed_features and 
> Map_features. 

Looks quite well thought out to me in general. Note however that
members of a relation are not ordered! Somewhere you say "... in
sequence", but there is no built-in sequence unless you use the role
to number your members (member_1,member_2 etc).

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00.09' E008°23.33'