[OSM-talk] RoadMap development for OSM
Ulf Lamping
ulf.lamping at web.de
Sun Oct 28 11:07:29 GMT 2007
Paul Fox schrieb:
> hi -- forgive me for only lurking for a few days before diving
> in here.
>
> i'm the (current) maintainer of the "RoadMap" project
> (http://roadmap.sourceforge.net), an open source map rendering
> and navigation tool. roadmap primarily deals with maps derived
> from the TIGER data, but we also have converters for the Canadian
> RNF (Road Network File) data, and the ancient and inaccurate DCW
> (Digital Charts of the World) data. northern north america has
> been our focus, mainly because that's where the free data has
> been, and because that's where the developers live.
>
As no one seemed to answer your mail (at least not on this list), I'm
trying to shed some light here (not saying that I know a lot myself in
this regard ;-)
Most of the people at OSM are doing mapping, the people actually doing
the OSM development (servers, editors, ...) are pretty limited - so this
problem is not only with RoadMap.
There are some attempts to "bring OSM data to the people":
- RoadNav (similiar to RoadMap?) had a function to download OSM data and
rendered it with it's own functions (but at least 0.18 only supported
the no longer working OSM API 0.3 - we're at API 0.5 already)
- gpsdrive (similiar to RoadMap?) next release will have a way to
download OSM data and render it with mapnik (Linux only)
- there are attempts to bring pixmaps to garmin devices
There are certainly other projects like these and I don't know the
current state of all this, sorry.
So in the end, the current OSM development in this area is very
experimental, but most of the effort currently is focussed IMHO still on
the collection of data.
To my experience, you'll need to do a lot of things yourself and don't
expect that any change requests will be implemented (some because they
don't fit into the current implementation but most just because the
developers don't have the time) - there's a lot of stuff that needs to
be done and the developers already know it.
However, things are going slowly, but they are going on. For example:
driving directions "turn left only" (which is a must for routing) were
not really possible without the API 0.5 changes which was introduced
some weeks ago.
Regards, ULFL
P.S: I personally would love to see an Open Source Navigation Software
based on OSM data (preferably on Windows) - basically to experiment
where we need further improvements in the OSM data (IMO driving
directions is only one aspect that we need for a good routing software)
More information about the talk
mailing list