[OSM-talk] Possible rendering issue in Osmarender 5

[Jack Challen]

--- Robert Hart <bathterror at gmail.com> wrote:
> If you turn on segment numbering in JOSM the segments in that way are
> numbered 2, 4 and 5.  (i.e. there's a non-existent seg 1, and 3
> somewhere). Maybe this is confusing osmarender?  The id for that way
> is 5475093 maybe somebody can have a look? or you should delete it and
> start again?

Ah, cool. I like that idea. I've deleted the way and re-made it. Thanks for the
tip!

jack


      ___________________________________________________________ 
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good  http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html