[OSM-talk] T at H error

[Sebastian at SSpaeth.de]

On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:53:20AM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I think we can do that even before we pass the data into osmarender.
> It is a very t at h specific requirement so maybe osmarender should not
> be burdened with it. On the other hand that would require an extra XML
> parsing step, in addition to all the ones we have already ;-)

Well, Frollo at least, is going away in 0.5. So we have one less step to
perform. The UTF-8 check could also, theoretically, go away as the
server realiably sends UTF-8 now (although that step doesn't seem to
take long).
 
> I'm loathe to tie loads of things to 0.5 deployment, but in this
> specific case, maybe we can let this wait until 0.5 is deployed.
> Because once we got rid segments, it is going to be much easier to
> just subdivide all nodes in the OSM file into 4 (or so) groups and

I agree, let's look into this post 0.5. That is going to take enough
tweaking already, I'd say.

spaetz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20070922/93a11ec9/attachment.pgp>