[OSM-talk] Mapping Mottram and Tintwistle proposed bypass

[Robert (Jamie) Munro]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stephen Wing wrote:
| On 01/04/2008, *Norbert Hoffmann* <nhoffmann at spamfence.net
| <mailto:nhoffmann at spamfence.net>> wrote:
|
|     >Ok, so how do I tag a section of highway that is going to be grubbed
|     up and
|     >returned to nature (which is happening for short sections of the
A14 at
|     >Haughley Bends)?
|     >
|      >highway="trunk"
|      >construction="disused"
|     I think
|
|     highway="disused"
|     disused="trunk"
|
|     would be more consistent to "construction" and "proposed".
|
|
| Although that may be more consistent *once* the road has been dug up,
| this particular road is still in use at the moment;  in that case what
| should (if any) additional tags be applied to the road?

end_date=YYYY-MM-DD (estimated date if needed, leave off the day and or
the month if you like)

Hopefully renders will automatically take account of this at some point
in the future, meaning we will no longer need the:
x=y => x=z,z=y
hack (where z is proposed or disused or whatever)

Robert (Jamie) Munro
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH85qqz+aYVHdncI0RAtSyAKCs2y/QUQMENTUf9O7Rd4kduBVjuACeL1fO
0DcrWoRdPB8rLDFC3AHbUYM=
=wG54
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----