[OSM-talk] Copyright and official documents on the web
Andy Allan
gravitystorm at gmail.com
Mon Apr 7 11:21:38 BST 2008
I would view this as a citeable reference, as opposed to a copyright violation.
Cheers,
Andy
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Nick Whitelegg <nick at hogweed.org> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Have found evidence that a path I mapped yesterday has cycle rights:
>
> http://www.planning-inspectorate.gov.uk/southdowns/documents/MicrosoftWord1147-13-1.pdf
>
> (see section 6.7.1)
>
> Presumably I could tag this as highway=cycleway without there being a
> copyright issue? I would hope so, as this is not copied from a map - I have
> merely researched an official document to get the rights on the path.
>
> It's not tagged as cycleway yet, just as footway, but if people think it's OK
> I'll change to cycleway.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
More information about the talk
mailing list