[OSM-talk] tagging trailblazes / marked paths

[Frederik Ramm]

Hi,

Tom Hughes wrote:
> It was "approved" on the basis of a tiny vote on the wiki and I would 
> say there is zero chance of most people switching from the tags that 
> have been in use for several years to some new scheme that, as I 
> understand it, requires about five tags for each path.

 > Given that most of the UK examples on the wiki were actually wrong by
 > their own definition last time I looked I certainly plan to stick to
 > what we've always done.

A very similar thing seems to have happened recently with the "Crossing" 
tag.

I've never been a friend of that voting business but it seems to get 
more absurd every day. Is it perhaps time now to have a vote on 
abolishing votes altogehter - or should we continue to let people vote 
on whatever they like and ignore the results? It's fine with me but 
seems to irritate newbies who lack the stubbornness that speaks from 
your above paragraph ;-)

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"