[OSM-talk] Large Rivers in general, mapnik rendering in Particular

Artem Pavlenko artem.mapnik at googlemail.com
Tue Feb 12 16:02:22 GMT 2008


On 8 Feb 2008, at 19:12, David Groom wrote:

>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Artem Pavlenko"  
> <artem.mapnik at googlemail.com>
> To: "David Earl" <david at frankieandshadow.com>
> Cc: "David Groom" <reviews at pacific-rim.net>; "talk Openstreetmap"  
> <talk at openstreetmap.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 12:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers in general, mapnik rendering  
> in Particular
>
>
>>
>> On 8 Feb 2008, at 12:05, David Earl wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/02/2008 11:54, David Groom wrote:
>>>> You mean like
>>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/ 
>>>> Rivers, which
>>>> would be my ideal,
>>>
>>> Ah, yes.
>>>
>>> I was suggesting putting in the connections across the river as  
>>> well,
>>> but there isn't any reason why if the renderer is building its own
>>> polygon from the relation that it can't imply a connection from  
>>> the  end
>>> of each way to the start of the other.
>>>
>>> Allowing more than one contiguous way on each bank would also be   
>>> useful.
>>
>>
>>> I'll edit the wiki.
>>
>> Could you put some visual examples, please?
>
> Artem, what i had in mind is now shown on http:// 
> wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Rivers
>
> David G

Yep, we can live with this.
Artem
>
>>>
>>> David
>>
>> Artem
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>
>
>





More information about the talk mailing list