[OSM-talk] Parking symbols: YUCK!
David Earl
david at frankieandshadow.com
Tue Feb 26 15:47:54 GMT 2008
On 26/02/2008 15:43, David Earl wrote:
> On 26/02/2008 14:45, Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
>> Lester Caine wrote:
>> | ANY POI that is changed from node to area will potentially have the same
>> | problem, and we should be fixing the general rule not starting to build
>> | another set of pages for voting on every POI node/area conflict debate?
>
> I strongly disagree with doing this generally, and will get very upset
> if you start deleting my carefully surveyed school nodes for example.
> The positions where I've put of these is significant within quite
> extensive school grounds.
I should say, I'd have no strong objection in this case to changing
these amenity=school nodes to building=school NODES, but that's a very
different prospect from deleting them.
Ideally I'd have building=school areas, but it is rarely possible to get
the shapes on the ground, and Yahoo satellite imagery is a luxury
reserved for particular urban areas (someone has carefully done this for
the Cambridge colleges, which looks great).
David
More information about the talk
mailing list